The difference between the Adams County Republicans and the Adams County Democrats:

“We want to control our own life, not yours”

“We support every individual choice that does not take away someone else’s choice”.

“Freedom and Liberty vs. Control”

It’s an easy decision for us….



Democrats, like Joe Salazar, say voter fraud doesn’t exist.  How naive are you, Joe?

James O’Keefe Strikes Again
The guerilla filmmaker has exposed how voter fraud is both easy and condoned in Colorado.

(Image: Project Veritas video via YouTube)

John Fund

Many liberals are adamant there is no threat of voter fraud that justifies efforts to improve the integrity of elections. “There is no real concrete evidence of voter fraud,” tweeted Donna Brazile, former acting chair of the Democratic National Committee, this week. “It’s a big ass lie.”

James O’Keefe, the guerilla filmmaker who brought down the ACORN voter-registration fraudsters in 2010 and forced the resignation of NPR executives, politely disagrees. Today, he is releasing some new undercover footage that raises disturbing questions about ballot integrity in Colorado, the site of fiercely contested races for the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House, and the governorship. When he raised the issue of filling out some of the unused ballots that are mailed to every household in the state this month, he was told by Meredith Hicks, the director of Work for Progress, a liberal group funded by Democratic Super PACS.: “That is not even like lying or something, if someone throws out a ballot, like if you want to fill it out you should do it.” She then brazenly offered O’Keefe, disguised as a middle-aged college instructor, a job with her group.

The video of O’Keefe’s encounters with other operatives is equally disturbing.  He has a conversation with Greenpeace employee Christina Topping, and suggests he might have access to unused ballots from people who have recently moved out of college fraternity houses. “I mean it is putting the votes to good use,” she responds. “So really, truly, like yeah, that is awesome.”Colorado secretary of state Scott Gessler, along with several county election clerks, have raised warning flags that a new state law that automatically mails a ballot to everyone is an engraved invitation to commit fraud. “Sending ballots to people who did not even ask for them or have moved out of state is asking for trouble” he told me. For example, little can stop someone who collects discarded ballots from trash cans, fills out the ballots, and mails them in. Election workers are supposed to compare signatures on registration records with signed ballots. But if a person has a “witness” who signs the ballot on the witness line, then the signatures do not have to match and the vote is counted.

Secretary of State Gessler had futile arguments with Democratic state legislators last year who insisted on ramming a bill through that mandated Colorado become the only state in the nation with both all-mail balloting and same-day registration. Under same-day registration someone can register to vote online, have a mail ballot sent to them, and never physically show up to register or vote. Other places that use same-day registration treat the vote as a provisional ballot pending verification. Colorado immediately counts the vote and there is no way to separate it out if the person who votes is later found ineligible. “We know people in other states with better integrity safeguards have cheated using the cover of these methods,” Gessler told me. A decade ago, Melody Rose, then a liberal professor at Oregon State University, concluded that state’s vote-by-mail system “brings a perpetual risk of systemic fraud” in elections with razor-thin margins.

“Voter fraud is incredibly difficult to detect and prosecute, absent a direct confession,” Gessler says as he notes that in other areas of law-breaking, we do not judge how much of it there is merely by the number of related prosecutions. But he also notes there is evidence of just how easy voter fraud is to commit. Last December, New York City’s Department of Investigation detailed how its undercover agents claimed at 63 polling places to be individuals who were in fact dead, had moved out of town, or who were in jail. In 61 instances, or 97 percent of the time, they were allowed to vote. (To avoid skewing results, they voted only for nonexistent write-in candidates.) How did the city’s Board of Elections respond? Did it immediately probe and reform their sloppy procedures? Not at all. It instead demanded that the investigators be prosecuted. Most officials are loath to admit how vulnerable election systems are, but privately many express worry that close elections could be flipped by fraud.

Nor are such sad examples limited to New York. In 2008, the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of voter-ID laws in a 6–3 opinion written by John Paul Stevens, then the most liberal member of the court. He noted that the record “demonstrates that not only is the risk of voter fraud real but that it could affect the outcome of a close election.” Stevens had witnessed the Daley machine up close manipulate local elections through fraud and chicanery during a distinguished legal career in Chicago that included serving both as a special counsel to a commission rooting out corruption and as a judge.

I understand that Donna Brazile devoutly wants to wish away the notion of voter fraud. But by overwhelming margins, the American people believe it is a real problem and support steps to combat it. Indeed, a Rasmussen survey in 2013 found that a greater percentage of African Americans viewed voter fraud as a serious problem than did whites. That is because, as former Democratic congressman Artur Davis of Alabama told me: “Minority voters are often the biggest victims of voter fraud as reform movements in cities and depressed rural areas are crushed by fraudulent machine voting. I have seen it with my own eyes in Alabama.”

As with his expose of ACORN, James O’Keefe deserves credit for once again uncovering the potential for corruption at the ballot box while too many journalists keep their noses buried in campaign-finance reports.  Both kinds of reporting are valuable, but O’Keefe appears to be a rare bird interested in ballot integrity.

— John Fund is national affairs correspondent for NRO and co-author, with Hans Von Spakovsky, of Who’s Counting? How Fraudsters and Bureaucrats Put Your Vote at Risk.


U.S. Sen. Mark Udall, D-Colo. (associated press photographs)

U.S. Sen. Mark Udall, D-Colo. (associated press photographs) 
– The Washington Times – Friday, October 17, 2014

DENVER—The Colorado Division of Insurance announced Friday a surge in health-care policy cancellations in the wake of Obamacare, just what Democratic candidates in high-profile races didn’t need less than three weeks before Election Day.

In a letter to state Senate Republicans, Colorado insurance commissioner Marguerite Salazar said that more than 22,000 Coloradans received cancellation notices in the last month, and that 192,942 Coloradans will lose their policies at the end of 2015.

That would bring the total number of cancellations in Colorado to more than 550,000 by the time the Affordable Care Act has been fully implemented and non-compliant plans have been phased out. Ten Colorado carriers have opted to continue offering non-compliant plans through 2015, Ms. Salazar said.

The report fueled a fresh barrage of Republican attacks against vulnerable Democrats, starting with Gov. John Hickenlooper and Sen. Mark Udall, both of whom are locked in tight reelection fights. Republican Rep. Cory Gardner issued a statement Friday blasting Mr. Udall’s continued support for Obamacare.

“Coloradans continue to pay the price for Senator Udall’s broken promise,” said Mr. Gardner, who’s challenging the Democratic incumbent. “It’s unfortunate Senator Udall has been so eager to please President Obama that he has forgotten thousands of Coloradans across our state.”

Mr. Udall has previously noted that the vast majority of those receiving cancellation notices have been offered new policies, although critics argue they’re not the same. →']);" class="more-link">Continue reading

David Bossie, Citizens United

In this Jan. 21, 2010, file photo Citizens United President David Bossie talks on his cell phone outside the Supreme Court in Washington after the court’s ruling on the campaign finance reform case. (Lauren Victoria Burke, Associated Press file photo)


Citizens United, the conservative group behind the new film “Rocky Mountain Heist,” can run ads promoting the movie, but still risk answering for it in court, the Colorado Secretary of State’s Office said.

Any person or group could file a complaint alleging the advertisements are election-time attack ads, not a means of reporting news, Deputy Secretary of State Suzanne Staiert told Citizens United in an advisory opinion.

Citizens United announced Sunday it intends to spend $170,000 on TV ads and another $40,000 for online promotions of the documentary about how liberals have gained ground in Colorado between now and the Nov. 4 election.

“We are glad that the Secretary of State’s Office has recognized Citizens United as a media entity and that advertisements for our film ‘Rocky Mountain Heist’ will be exempt from reporting and disclosure requirements just as advertisements made by The Denver Post or any other media entity would be,” the organization’s president, David N. Bossie, said in a statement.

The U.S. 10th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled last week that Citizens United should have the same protections as traditional media, meaning the Virginia-based non-profit would not have to disclose the donors who paid for the movie.

The court, however, said the Secretary of State’s Office could determine if ads that specifically name a candidate up for election qualify as electioneering, which would require disclosure.

“Historically, Colorado broadcast facilities and publishers making exempt electioneering communications or expenditures have not disclosed the money raised for or spent on associated advertising because the activity falls within the regular scope and course of business,” Staiert stated in the opinion.

She said she had reviewed the ads and they qualified for the exemption.

The liberal-leaning Colorado Ethics Watch and other critics of Citizens United claimed victory last week when the appeals court said ads that attack candidates could still be deemed an attempt to influence voters immediately before an election.

The first TV ad that could start showing this week is titled “You Don’t Know Hick,” as in Democratic Gov. John Hickenlooper, who is in a tight race against Republican nominee Bob Beauprez. The 30-second spot has 12 seconds focused on Hickenlooper.

“We expect Citizens United will comply with Colorado law and so no complaint will be necessary,” said Luis Toro, director of Colorado Ethics Watch.

Though the ads don’t specifically cite the upcoming election or urge support for Beauprez, the law states that anyone who spends more than $1,000 on ads and names a candidate during the last 60 days before the election must disclose the source of that money, Toro said.

Joey Bunch: 303-954-1174, jbunch@denverpost.com or twitter.com/joeybunch


McIntosh highlights career, community involvement


During the more than 26 years Michael McIntosh has been with the Adams County Sheriff’s Office, he has served in every division of the agency.

He’s been a patrol deputy, detective, SWAT team leader, lieutenant and division captain, and now the division chief of administrative services.

“What I’m running on is experience, and I think it matters,” said the Republican candidate for sheriff.

As the division chief, McIntosh has direct oversight of training, IT, civil, human resources, finance, records and public information office sections. His resume also includes oversight of the Sheriff’s Office annual $58 million budget and oversight and administration of 520 full-time employees and sworn officers.

“Essentially, I’m running the business side of the sheriff’s office, and I have for the past five years,” he said.

He is also the Peace Officer Standards and Training (POST) Academy directory and helped develop the regional training facility, Flatrock.

His ultimate goal as sheriff would be to suspend the municipal inmate cap at the jail, which has caused consternation among the cities within Adams County.

“I have a strong desire to completely get rid of the cap,” he said.

He said he did not like officers on the scene of an incident have to worry if his or her municipality has reached its cap and if an arrest should be made. He also did not like that people who are low risks to society are put in jail and face losing their jobs.

However, he added, “I’m a firm believer that if they are a threat to our community they need to be in jail.”

He said there were many different programs that worked in the past that the county should look into using to help reduce the inmate population in the jail.

If elected as sheriff, McIntosh said he would like to create a DNA lab in the county. Right now the county sends its DNA evidence to the Colorado Bureau of Investigations lab, which can be time consuming, he said.

“DNA evidence has been so critical with most of our trials, so demand on processing evidence has expanded greatly,” McIntosh said. “(Our own lab) opens up the door for our investigators to develop and eliminate suspects quicker.”

While the state does not charge the county now for using its lab, McIntosh said he suspects a fee will be coming shortly.

McIntosh listed his involvement with the community: board member of the Community Reach Center and Community of Faith United; a committee member of the Metro North Chamber of Commerce, Business and Government Affairs; and board chair of Prairie Community Church.

“I’m not just focused internally on our employees,” he said. “I’m focused externally on the community to know what its needs are. I want to have a Sheriff’s Office that has an impact on the communities we serve.”

McIntosh has lived in Adams County for almost 40 years and graduated from Brighton High School. He served in the U.S. Navy before joining the Sheriff’s Office in 1988. He and his wife, Cathy, have two children.



Adams County resident and 27-year retired federal fraud investigator John Sampson filed a 9-page affidavit, that according to the terms of C.R.S §§ 1-13-1-1, requires the district attorney to “investigate, and, if reasonable grounds appear therefor, he shall prosecute the violator.”

Martinez currently sits on the Brighton City Council. She ran for the office unopposed in 2007 (and again in 2011), using a Brighton address — an Adams County property she co-owns with her mother. She also owns a Boulder County property in Lafayette where her husband, Brad Rieke, and their two children live.

The discrepancy arose because Martinez appears only to be using the Brighton address as a means by which to qualify her to run for office and serve in Adams County. Evidence acquired by Sampson shows she did not start using the Brighton address until she first ran for City Council, at which time she also changed her vehicle and voter registrations from Boulder to Brighton.

The eligibility of a candidate for county office is defined in Article XIV of the Colorado Constitution, which says a person must have resided in that county for one year preceding the election. See Hanlen v. Gessler, 13SA306, at *9-10 (Colo. 2014).

Sampson was initially hired by the Republican candidate for Clerk and Recorder, Stan Martin, to conduct an investigation after he heard persistent rumors and accusations that Martinez actually resided with her family in Boulder. Martinez was even recently quoted in the Denver Post as stating that her husband and two children do live at their Lafayette address.

In September Martin filed a lawsuit against Martinez in Adams County District Court, where Martinez failed to appear under subpoena along with official documents. Martinez continues to deny being served a subpoena, despite the fact it was done in the presence of police officers at her Boulder address. The presiding judge even ruled she was legally served “by refusal.” Given Martinez’s claim of 25+ years “in the legal field” , she should know that “service by refusal” does not excuse her from appearing in court.

The Court ruling noted that “many of the documents which may have been dispositive on the issue of Candidate’s residence were not provided by Candidate, even though they were ordered via subpoena.” Judge Warner ruled:

The Court finds that the totality of the evidence concerning the residence, and thus, eligibility for election is equivocal. The evidence raises a salient issue concerning the residence and eligibility of a candidate for public office that administers essential duties that go to the core of our democracy.

The judge did not rule her in contempt of court because the court did not issue the subpoena and the plaintiff attorney never requested a bench warrant be issued. There was no time to address the issue, given the ballots had to go to print the following day. In fact, Judge Warner went so far as to state in the ruling that Martinez’s eligibility to run for office in Adams County was “questionable.”

In a press release, Martin said:

Mrs. Martinez concealing key evidence, imperative to this case, including state and federal tax returns, deed and mortgage documents, leasehold agreements, and driver’s license further proves she has something to hide.

After hearing that Martinez bragged at the Adams County Democrat Executive Committee meeting following the court ruling about beating the case without having to even show up, Sampson decided to take matters into his own hands and filed a complaint with the District Attorney’s office on October 1.

Sampson met with County investigators last Friday when he turned over all his evidence. In an exclusive interview with Watchdog Wire, Sampson said the investigators had already started looking into the matter prior to his meeting.

In a radio interview with host Ken Clark of AM 560 KLZ, Sampson also announced he would file a second complaint over Martinez’s most recent campaign finance report filing in which she listed her husband’s address as being in Brighton. On May 29, 2014, Rieke changed his voter registration from Adams County back to the Boulder address where he actually resides.

Sampson also discovered that when Martinez’s mom purchased the house in 2003, she did not disclose to the mortgage company that she was going to put her daughter on the property records and not on the financial records; this could also constitute a form ofmortgage fraud / occupancy fraud. Essentially one cannot give away property rights without attaching the financial obligation; otherwise, it would make it difficult for the financial institution to collect on a default note.

In his latest media release, Stan Martin said:

Ms. Martinez had a golden opportunity to put this contentious issue to rest; however, her lack of respect for our judicial process, her decision not to appear in court even though subpoenaed, and her refusal to produce key documents such as federal and state tax returns, mortgage documents and leasehold agreements has landed her in this position. If my opponent has nothing to hide, she would have appeared in court with those documents and exonerated herself.

The primary charge of duties for the Clerk and Recorder in Adams County is to be the Chief Election Officer responsible for enforcing and administering the very election law she appears to be violating. The Clerk and Recorder is also responsible for maintaining the county’s records, including property and real estate transactions for motor vehicles and real estate, for which she also apparently has no regard. According to Sampson, “The irony is inescapable and indefensible.”

It is unknown how much this investigation will cost county taxpayers. Referring to the history of scandals that has plagued Adams County, Martin also stated:

It’s extremely important the citizens of Adams County hire a Clerk and Recorder that is ethical and accountable. It’s imperative we put the corruption and scandals in the past, move forward in a positive direction and continue to rebuild Adams County’s credibility and image.

Watchdog Wire attempted to reach Martinez for comment, but our calls were not returned.

If Martinez wins the election and is found ineligible, then the voters of Adams County will not be selecting their new Clerk. Rather, a Democratic Party vacancy committee would appoint one in her stead.


ADCO candidates face off

Forum an opportunity to highlight experience, goals

Candidates vying for a spot on the Adams County Board of Commissioners shared their views during County Candidate Meeting Sept. 30 hosted by the League of Women Voters of Adams County at Skyview Campus in Thornton. From left, Jan Pawlowski, Wilma Rose, Manuel Solano, Steve O’Dorisio, Joe Domenico and Erik Hansen. Photo by Tammy Kranz?
Candidates vying for a spot on the Adams County Board of Commissioners shared their views during County Candidate Meeting Sept. 30 hosted by the League of Women Voters of Adams County at Skyview Campus in Thornton. From left, Jan Pawlowski, Wilma Rose, Manuel Solano, Steve O’Dorisio, Joe Domenico and Erik Hansen. Photo by Tammy Kranz?

Adams County assessor candidate John Schaul took exception to being called “handpicked” by his opponent Patsy Melonakis during a forum held last week.

Candidates for assessor, sheriff, treasurer, clerk and recorder, coroner, and board of county commissioners participated in a Candidates Meeting Sept. 30 hosted by the League of Women Voters of Adams County at Skyview Campus in Thornton.

The candidates had a couple minutes to tell the audience about themselves then they were asked questions by the audience. For the assessor candidates, one audience member questioned why Melonakis referred to Schaul as current Assessor Gil Reyes’ “hand-picked deputy” in her campaign leaflets.

Melonakis answered because Reyes chose Schaul to be the deputy assessor.

Schaul called that label a stretch and said he was asked to be the deputy in 2010 because Reyes had health and family issues.

“I was not handpicked,” he said. “I was there prior than most of the staff.”

Melonakis brought up the scandals that plagued Reyes. The current assessor pleaded no contest to charges of official misconduct in 2013. He was accused of lowering appraised values of properties owned by his top campaign contributor. Reyes also pleaded guilty in 2011 for failure to report gifts.

“You have to have the moral fiber to stand up for your convictions and do the right thing,” she said.

She added if she was elected, her first goal would be to familiarize herself with everyone in the assessor’s office.

Schaul pointed out that his knowledge and experience — two and a half decades worth — were going to be needed during 2015 because reappraisals were due.

Melonakis is the Republican candidate and has been in property management and a real estate broker for 21 years. Schaul, the Democrat candidate, is a state licensed appraiser.

Incumbent Adams County Coroner Monica Broncucia-Jordan, Democrat, faced off with Republican candidate Mike Arnall. Broncucia-Jordan highlighted her experience, mainly the past four years she has been the coroner.

Arnall highlighted his 25 years of forensic pathology experience and that he has done 4,000 autopsies and testified in 300-400 homicide trials in the nation.

“If residents want a coroner that is a certified forensic pathologist, they should vote for me,” he said.

Broncucia-Jordan pointed out that a coroner’s job was to administrate, and that the coroner’s office would have a certified forensic pathologist on staff regardless of who won.

“I hope that during the last four years in office I’ve earned your support and respect,” she said.

The candidates for clerk and recorder tangled about the county’s ability to streamline services at the Department of Motor Vehicles.

Republican candidate Stan Martin said if he was elected into the office, he would work on decreasing wait times at the DMV. He said he has studied the Lobby Service System used in El Paso and the average wait time is 11 minutes.

Cynthia Martinez, Democrat, said that the DMV division was an agent of the state and that Adams County just could not implement change without its consent.

“When we talk about change it has to come through the state,” she said. “We work for them and they finance it.”

Martin rebutted: “We can absolutely put in our own lobby service system. We don’t need permission to do that.”

Martin has 23 years of experience in business management. Martinez is a current councilwoman in Brighton and has more than 25 years in the legal field.

Martinez said one of the things she would like to do is update the software in the Clerk & Recorder Office.

Aside from shortening the DMV wait time, Martin said he would like to look into why the office is spending $500,000 in overtime each year.

“When you’re working them too much they get tired, burned out and make mistakes,” he said.

The only candidate that was not able to make it was Steve Douglas, a Commerce City councilman, who is running against incumbent Brigitte Grimm for the treasurer spot.

Douglas, a Democrat, wrote a letter apologizing for his absence, explaining that there was an emergency council meeting he had to attend.

Grimm, a Republican, did share with the audience her background and qualifications.


Republican candidate Mike McIntosh and Democratic candidate Rick Reigenborn faced off Sept. 30 during a County Candidate Meeting hosted by the League of Women Voters of Adams County at Skyview Campus in Thornton. ?Photo by Tammy Kranz

Republican candidate Mike McIntosh and Democratic candidate Rick Reigenborn faced off Sept. 30 during a County Candidate Meeting hosted by the League of Women Voters of Adams County at Skyview Campus in Thornton. ?Photo by Tammy Kranz

The spotlight at a recent candidate forum shone on who was best qualified to manage the annual $58 million budget at the Adams County Sheriff’s Office.

Sheriff candidates Republican Mike McIntosh and Democrat Rick Reigenborn faced off Sept. 30 during a County Candidate Meeting hosted by the League of Women Voters of Adams County at Skyview Campus in Thornton.

After a few minutes introducing themselves, the audience began asking questions. One dealt with the experience each man had handling a budget.

Reigenborn said he managed the budget for the Colorado Fraternal Order of Police when he served as the organization’s president.

“We always came in under budget,” he said. He added, “Being a single dad on a paycheck once a month I know about running a budget.”

As division chief at the Adams County Sheriff’s Office, McIntosh said he has overseen the budget for the past five years. The economical downturn forced him make difficult decisions about what to cut, he added.

“It’s real easy to spend within a budget when money is coming in,” he said, but it’s harder to do that during a financial crunch.

Reigenborn questioned how hard managing the budget could be when, he said, 70 percent of the budget is employee wages and most of the remainder goes to running the jail.

“It doesn’t take a whole lot of mathematics to figure that out,” he said.

Reigenborn has been in law enforcement for 23 years, and during his time with Adams County has served as field patrolman, instructor, SWAT team member, undercover narcotics detective and detective sergeant. He is now a sergeant in the patrol division.

Reigenborn’s campaign slogan focuses on getting back to the basics of law enforcement.

“Let’s get back to being cops, not politicians,” he said.

McIntosh has been with the Adams County Sheriff’s Office for more than 26 years and has served as a leader in every division.

“I think it’s important a CEO of this organization has that level of experience,” said McIntosh, whose campaign slogan is experience matters.

Both candidates said they would like to end the municipal inmate cap at the jail and bring back unity at the Sheriff’s Office.



Link to our Facebook Page
Link to our Rss Page
Link to our Twitter Page




2014 Election Calendar


contact us





Monthly Exec Meetings

Second Tues Every Month
Join DCs, PCPs, Friends & Neighbors at Omera Ford
400 W 104th Ave, Northglenn
: 6:30pm Meeting: 7pm – 9pm

Leg Scorecard


Lie Of The Year


The 17.5 Rule

70% of eligible voters are registered
30% of eligible voters are not registered
50% of the 70% registered, vote
So 35% of eligible voters actually vote
It takes 17.5% of the population to win
That is 25% of registered voters


Udall LIed

Hold Lois Lerner Accountable


Exempt Me Too


Powerful Messaging

Teacher Union Exposed


No ID Needed To Vote

Stop Voter Fraud

Ronald Reagan Button

Order your individually numbered commemorative vintage 1980 Reagan Button !

Order Now! $12 Contribution
Shipping Included

Employer (required):
Occupation (required):

Paid for by the Adams County Republican Party © 2013. All Rights Reserved

Not authorized by any Candidate or Candidate Committee